Axel Rudakubana, who has been charged with murder in connection with the deaths of three young girls at a Taylor Swift-themed dance event in Southport, is also facing charges under the Terrorism Act for possessing materials related to the terrorist group al-Qaeda, an Islamist militant organisation, and for producing ricin, a deadly biological toxin.
This case is particularly shocking, highlighting how the current Labour establishment is willing to mislead and deceive the public and the justice system. This manipulation allows for lengthy prison sentences to be imposed on individuals who, at most, are guilty of sending ill-considered, awkward, or even objectionable texts or tweets—comments often retracted, deleted, or apologised for shortly after being made.
His house would have been raided immediately and its contents noted; yet only now, months later are we informed that they included equipment for making the deadly poison ricin and a Jihadist manual; only now are terrorism charges being brought against him. Why not back in July? Clearly, because it suited the Authorities to exonerate Islamism from any involvement while the outrage was raw and widely-felt. They wanted to implicate people who knew or suspected the truth of ‘hate crimes’. Had judges, juries, magistrates and journalists been better informed, they might have seen the defendants in a more favourable light.
The public has been gradually provided with the information initially known to the State. The Stockport triple child murderer was born in Cardiff to Rwandan Christian parents and moved to the Southport area in 2013; he was definitely not a Muslim, as some have falsely claimed.
The government, which for months has been telling us that the Southport attack was not a terrorist incident, denies any cover-up despite knowing about Rudakubana possessing the al-Qaeda training manual, which gives advice about terrorism and urban warfare. This denial raises serious questions about the government’s commitment to transparency and public safety.
In other words, the State is guilty of both suppressio veri (intentionally hiding or withholding important information to deceive or mislead others) and suggestio falsi (lying or providing false information to mislead others). It has created a false narrative portraying ‘Islamophobic’ far-right individuals as motivated by irrational hatred instead of representing the legitimate concerns of everyday citizens.
How many more illegal immigrants, now referred to as ‘irregular’ asylum seekers, could potentially be jihadists planning harm against us? We don’t know and may never find out as long as the State keeps us in the dark.
The “strategy of tension” concept will be familiar to anyone who visited Italy during the 1970s. Its primary purpose was straightforward: it allowed authorities to implement repressive measures that would otherwise be unacceptable under the guise of protecting the public from a threat that the State itself had created. Once again, we are left asking: Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? In other words, who will protect us from the police?
Join us!
Click here to join us as a member.
Or sign up for our free email newsletter at the bottom of the page.
Follow us and share our content on these social media platforms using the links below:
X (formerly known as Twitter): @BritishDems
British Democrats: JOIN
The Party of British Identity
No Comments