By Dr Jim Lewthwaite
Thousands of words have been spent on the horrific murder of three children in Southport last July, yet one word is noticeably absent: racism. This is unusual considering that the perpetrator was of Black African ancestry, while the victims were all White (British and Portuguese). If the situation had been reversed and a white British youth had murdered three Black girls, there would have been an outcry of Stephen Lawrence proportions and very likely violent anti-white riots in Black areas, similar to Brixton in 1981.
It’s crucial to address the issue of racism, especially in cases where the media seems to reserve the term for white offenders. Take the murder of 17-year-old Bedford Academy student Thomas Taylor last year by three Black youths, for instance. Why was it not suggested to be racially motivated? In Rudakubana’s case, the murders in Southport followed years of outbursts of violent hatred towards his fellow students and teachers at his school. Proving racism can be challenging, especially when the racial identity of the victims is often concealed. However, his claim of being bullied on racial grounds is undoubtedly a significant clue.
The hesitation to address the ‘elephant in the room’ may also have biological roots.
Could the complexities of human behaviour be intricately linked to our biological makeup? The very essence of altruism, which is deeply ingrained in the fabric of White people, may have served as a survival mechanism when interactions were limited to homogeneous groups. Perhaps the reluctance to address the biological factors contributing to certain behaviours stems from a deeply rooted evolutionary trait. As we explore the intricate connections between history and biology, it becomes clear that understanding the mysteries of human nature requires a broad approach that challenges us to go beyond simple ideological labels and think more deeply about the factors at play.
Join us!
Click here to join us as a member.
Or sign up for our free email newsletter at the bottom of the page.
Follow us and share our content on these social media platforms using the links below:
X (formerly known as Twitter): @BritishDems
British Democrats: JOIN
The Party of British Identity
The Party Chairman is right. If a white youth were the attacker, and the victims were girls of African descent – or for that matter any ethnicity different to that of the white offender- the issue of race would dominate the entire mass media narrative.
Not only would Left wing groups be demanding the attack be treated as a racially motivated hate crime, but the entire mainstream media would be framing the crime as a racial issue.
So why has the obvious racial factor suddenly vanished from the discussion ? For the same reason it always does when white people are the victims : It would negate the established consensus on racism, which is all about guilting whites into feeling they have to atone for anything and everything.