By Peter Finch
Across the Western world, people are waking up to creeping surveillance and the loss of privacy. Words like “Orwellian” are now mainstream because many sense that real problems are being used to justify ever‑expanding technological control.
Here in Britain, amendments linked to the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill and the roll‑out of the Online Safety Act have sharpened those fears. Some online claims are exaggerated, but the direction of travel is real and it deserves close attention.
Child safety is non‑negotiable
The British Democrats are clear: protecting children from abuse and exploitation is non‑negotiable. Online platforms and criminal networks have exploited technology for too long, and parents are right to demand action.
What we reject is the idea that family privacy and basic civil liberties can be treated as acceptable collateral damage. The political elite presents a false choice: either accept permanent monitoring or you do not care about children. That is a lie.
From age checks to digital ID
When the Online Safety Act came into force, ministers sold it as a simple child‑protection law. In reality, it has laid the foundations of a Digital ID regime by the back door. Big social media platforms are now required to use what the law calls “highly effective age assurance”.
Old tick‑box checks have been scrapped. In their place we are getting three new systems:
- facial age estimation that scans your face with artificial intelligence
- photo‑ID matching, where you upload a passport or driving licence and take a live selfie
- digital wallets, such as app‑based or GOV.UK‑style credentials that you ping to websites to prove your age
The government insists you do not need a Digital ID to live in Britain. Technically that may be true. But try using Reddit, Instagram, TikTok or Discord without handing over ID or your face and you will soon find a legal age‑gate in your way. It is “voluntary” only on paper.
Surveillance by default is not the answer
Plans for device‑level scanning, default monitoring and constant online verification raise basic questions that those in power never answer honestly.
Who decides what is scanned and how those rules can be widened?
How will misuse be prevented and punished?
What stops future governments quietly expanding these powers once the infrastructure is in place?
Once such systems exist, they can be repurposed without new technology, only new policy. Powers granted for narrow aims rarely stay narrow. What begins as “protect the children” can easily become “check everyone, for everything, all the time”.
This is part of a wider pattern: more centralised control, more data‑sharing and less accountability when things go wrong. Decisions are handed down by a distant policy class that treats ordinary Britons as a problem to be managed, not as citizens to be trusted.
The end of anonymity by default
The UK is drifting from anonymity by default towards verification by default. If under‑16s are banned from social media, every adult will be dragged into a compulsory proof‑of‑age system just to use basic online services.
We are told that these systems are “privacy‑preserving” because websites may only see a yes or no about your age. But to get that answer, you still have to surrender your personal data to a company or government service first. Once millions are enrolled, it becomes easy to bolt on banking, healthcare, travel and even voting.
People call this Orwellian because private devices are turning into monitoring tools, constant inspection is being normalised, and slick slogans are offered in place of clear legal limits.
The British Democrats’ approach
The British Democrats reject the false choice between child protection and freedom. We say:
- target offenders and organised networks, not entire populations
- resource serious policing and international cooperation
- hold platforms directly accountable for repeated failures
- support parents with real tools and honest information, not hidden systems they never consented to
Routine monitoring of law‑abiding citizens is not child protection. It is mission creep and it is wrong.
Join us to defend British freedom
Our parents and grandparents did not fight wars and build our country so that a modern political elite could turn Britain into a permission‑based digital state. The right to private life, anonymous speech and free association is not an optional extra. It is the foundation of any free nation.
A society that trades privacy for the illusion of safety risks losing both. The British Democrats stand for strong child protection and robust civil liberties, for a Britain of independent citizens, not digital subjects.
If you believe our freedoms are being chipped away under the cover of “safety” and “wellbeing”, join us today. Help us stop this quiet theft of liberty and make sure no government ever holds permanent surveillance powers over the British people under any pretext.
Join us!
Click here to join us as a member.
Or sign up for our free email newsletter at the bottom of the page.
Follow us and share our content on these social media platforms using the links below:
No Comments