By Chairman, Dr Jim Lewthwaite
This parliamentary constituency does not exist as a real place: it consists of two distinct districts which ran two parallel elections with different outcomes; the larger entity swamped the lesser. Specifically, white working-class Denton voted for Reform at twice the level of 2024, but not in sufficient strength to overcome diverse Gorton (40% Pakistani and Bangladeshi Muslim mingled with students and “metropolitan” professionals), which backed the Greens.
Once a safe Labour seat, with three-quarters of electors voting for Left-wing parties, it saw tactical voting to stop Reform by lining up behind the Greens, relegating Labour to third place. The Greens simply turned a tactic practised by Labour for decades, pandering to the Muslim bloc vote, against them, while Starmer’s fixation with the “Far Right” (Reform!) blinded him to the threat from the Left. The biter bit!
At the end of the day, there weren’t enough working-class whites to go round. Although the overall voter turnout was unusually high, it’s a safe bet that it was higher among the ethnics. Our people simply don’t have the same level of ethnocentrism, identity, group interest, or loyalty. Rather, they have been conditioned to feel ashamed of asserting their own rights in their own homeland. The most urgent mission for Nationalists is not to win people over to our point of view but to motivate them to VOTE AT ALL. Many more agree with us than vote for us: THIS MUST CHANGE.
So, the Greens won by not being Labour, not being Reform, and targeting the South Asian Muslim bloc. How far can this be extrapolated? Even in apparently similar Bradford, the situation is different. The Muslim vote will go rather to the Gaza Independents (who already have several councillors and are a Muslim party in all but name), while the Greens have already taken over ultra-proletarian Tong ward, a former Labour heartland, where they depend instead on Catholic East Europeans, not noted for their Muslimophilia.
Thus, in Bradford, Labour faces annihilation from three directions: Greens, Reform, and Muslim Independents. The Tories will survive only in outlying rural areas, if they survive at all. One side-effect of the sectarianism and South Asian ethnic nationalism will be to drive Hindu and Sikh Indians into the rump Tories, as in Leicester; another will be to propel Pakistani politics onto our streets. When the corrupt canaille in Islamabad finally kill off the hugely popular Imran Khan, there will be riots in our streets. Pakistan now has a war with Afghanistan as well as a permanently volatile frontier with India in Kashmir, Mirpur in Azad Kashmir being the hometown of most Bradfordian ethnics. Expect fireworks!
The appeal of the Greens is closely tied to the eccentric personality of their leader, Zack Polanski, a gay Jew happy to embrace fanatical Islamists while having a markedly Zionist family background. The more he is put under the spotlight, the more obvious the contradictions will appear. The obvious move might be to dump the Lefty nonsense to hang on to the Muslims, except that these might defect to the Independent hardliners or fellow ethnics. Meanwhile, Labour would like to move Left, but Starmer’s obsession with the “Far Right” bogeyman could prevent this until he is jettisoned after the May elections debacle. Stasis, not leadership.
Where does that leave us Ethnonationalists? Surely, the appeal to unassimilated, enclave-dwelling Urdu and Bengali first-language speakers (possibly third-generation) legitimises, as if it were ever illegitimate, but “officially” it has been verboten for decades, our defence of our people. We can hardly be accused of sowing division among communities who have self-segregated and who cannot stand the sight of each other. The hypocrisy is beyond nauseous; it is risible.
The more the balkanisation proceeds, the more we need to remind the masses that we predicted everything that is now happening and tried to challenge it, often at the cost of jobs, careers, and even loss of liberty. So far from prejudice, hate, or fear, the usual allegations, this objective accuracy highlights the superiority of our analysis, our understanding of history, and our social and political theory. It is for the political class to explain their failure.
They will, of course, try to delete us from “official” history. Today I heard a Labour politician claim that the grooming gangs in Keighley were first called out by Ann Cryer, a blatant lie. It was, of course, our Angela Clarke and Channel 4. Ann was late on the scene and disowned by Labour, then as now in thrall to the Pakistani Muslims.
In conclusion, the aim must be to avoid ego-driven fratricide and to mobilise disaffected, feckless white working-class folk to vote in defence of their and their children’s self-interest, not to say, survival.
Follow us and share our content on these social media platforms using the links below:
X (formerly known as Twitter): @BritishDems
Promoted by the British Democrats, PO Box 11028, Loughborough, LE12 7YL.
Excellent article Jim. I was particularly struck by your reference to Sikhs and Hindus turning to the Tories. As you say, it has happened in Leicester and it has also happened in Harrow. Until quite recently I lived in Slough where Upton was the nicest ward with the most expensive houses; it’s population remained majority white longer than elsewhere in the borough and all three of it’s councilors were Conservatives (and white). But then, over the past thirty years, the white population was gradually replaced by an Asian population and the white Conservative councillors by Asian Labour members. But now – all three councillors are Conservative again! And all three have Hindu or Sikh names.
Could the Conservative Party be in the early stages of turning into a sectarian Hindu/ Sikh party? If so, the important question is – where will the white vote go?