By David Furness
The plan to send asylum-seekers to Rwanda has been ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court. The judgement backed an Appeal Court decision that the policy is unlawful under Britain’s Human Rights Act, which incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) into British law.
As the Conservative party implodes with perpetual infighting, it is obvious for all to see, Rishi Sunak is not serious about solving the problem of the ‘boat people’ arriving from France. Furthermore, the Rwanda plan wouldn’t have diverted even a fraction of the migrants arriving on our shores. Sunak is a cunning, barefaced lying, ruthless globalist!
The Far-left and the courts have taken the view that if someone calls themselves an ‘asylum seeker’ then they must be an asylum seeker. So, they must be protected by Britain’s Human Rights Act, the ECHR, the 1951 UN Refugee Convention, and many other laws.
Firstly, these so-called ‘asylum seekers’ are overwhelmingly economic migrants. They have passed through many ‘safe’ countries to get to the UK. A genuine asylum seeker is under an obligation to seek refuge in the nearest safe country.
Secondly, you may have noticed that the economic migrants (posing as asylum seekers) arriving in boats are all men. Where are the women and children? The Far Left expect us to believe that these ‘men’ are fleeing war, suffering persecution, or living in such intolerable conditions that they just had to leave behind the women and children!
Thirdly, we know that some lawyers are now under investigation for falsifying documents and boasting about how easy it is to manipulate the asylum-seeker process by telling lies.
It is clear what needs to be done. Time and time again, the courts have thwarted any attempt to take back control of our borders.
Therefore, we need to leave the ECHR, and some laws need to be repealed. For example, Section 31 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 was based on Article 31 of the UN 1951 Refugee Convention. This piece of legislation states that refugees who come to the UK have a statutory defence against certain immigration offences related to document fraud and illegal entry.
Repealing Section 31 is a necessity if we are to control our borders. Many other laws need to be repealed. However, I don’t think that Rishi Sunak has the backbone to stand up to the Far Left. I saw him recently on TV talking about how “we must make sure we meet our international obligations”. How about our national obligations to protect our borders?
Click here to join us as a member.
Or sign up for our free email newsletter at the bottom of the page.
Follow us on these Social Media platforms:
Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/BritishDems
Telegram:
https://t.me/British_Democrats
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/BritishDems
Gab:
https://gab.com/BritishDemocrats
British Democrats: JOIN
The Party of British Identity
I find everything horribly embarrasing, insulting people’s intelligence. The French would blockade our ports and the channel tunnel, if we did the same.
Gutless politicians giving into everyone apart from the British people who they continue to punish.
It’s beyond a farce. The Supreme Court is overriding parliament and a democratic vote. A foreign body, the UN, was involved in opposing it, why did the court alow them to interfere? Apparently the UN has produced reports saying that Rwanda is a safe place, yet opposed sending illegal immigrants there. Britain itself is not a safe place, large areas are no go zones and stabbings are comments place. The whole farce is funded by the taxpayer from beginning to end. To me lawyers she opposing this legislation because it will reduce their income.
How can a sovereign Supreme Court be overridden by anybody ? Further how can a court rule a law unlawful if it’s passed bythe House of Commons and House of lords, they are the lawmakers ! Obviously the lawyers see themselves as politicians.
The Rwanda plan was never a serious deterrent to illegal immigration and would only deport a few hundred of the tens of thousands arriving on boats. Furthermore, it is just a distraction from the millions arriving here ‘legally’.
Any new laws once verified by the House of Commons has to pass through the House of Lords. Baroness Kate Hoey said yesterday on the television that the Lords are full of people who basically believe in an open door immigration policy, the whole system is rotten to the core and anti the British people.
It’s just pure theatre.. The Conservative party wants to blame it on leftwing lawyers whilst allowing anyone in.